غسل الأمــوال بـين التبعية والاستقلال في البنيان القانوني

Abstract

This study aimed to know the two directions of traditional
jurisprudence regarding considering money laundering as an
independent crime or as a form of accessory criminal contribution, or
as a form of concealment of things obtained from a crime.
The study reached a number of results that tried to remove this
confusion; Including: The adaptation of money laundering as a form
of accessory criminal contribution does not fully comprehend money
laundering activities. Rather, it is encountered by many objective and
procedural obstacles, and adapting money laundering as a form of
concealment of things obtained from a crime - although it can
accommodate many Money laundering activities - it receives a
number of criticisms as well, so that it is difficult for this description
to stand in the face of many money laundering activities. Money
laundering or its curtailment does not stand up to substantial
criticism, as well as the possibility of non-public servants or other
qualified offenders escaping if they obtain funds from illegal
sources, and thus effective confrontation is not achieved.